Why AI Still Feels Like a Risky Bet for the C-Suite
- Derek Roush
- 4 days ago
- 2 min read

AI is on nearly every CEO’s radar. But, is AI still a risky bet for C-Suite executives? According to a recent IBM study cited by The National CIO Review, over 75% of CEOs believe that competitive advantage in the near future will be driven by AI. And yet, almost half of them don’t think their own executive teams are ready to lead that charge.
That’s not just hesitation. That’s a signal.
Despite the hype, and even with real progress being made, the disconnect between vision and readiness is stark. CEOs are getting the message: AI matters. But they’re also seeing something that doesn’t show up in the marketing decks—internal confusion, operational inertia, and gaps in expertise.
The Gap Between Urgency and Capability
This isn’t just a technical gap. It’s a leadership one. The C-suite is supposed to set direction, assign resources, and make the hard calls. But if those same leaders aren’t confident in their ability to assess AI initiatives, much less drive them, the whole thing stalls.
According to the report, CIOs and CTOs are more optimistic about their readiness than CEOs are. That suggests some internal disconnects. It also suggests many executives are treating AI like a buzzword, not a business lever.
The Talent Problem Is Real
Some CEOs admit they don’t yet have the talent or infrastructure to move forward. That’s fair. The market for experienced AI leadership is thin. It’s not just about hiring a head of AI. It’s about whether your teams can work with that person. Whether your systems are flexible enough to adapt. Whether your workflows are compatible with algorithmic decision-making.
Without those answers, moving fast becomes a liability.
AI Isn’t a Project. It’s a Shift.
One of the clearest insights from the study is that companies are treating AI like a series of short-term rollouts. That’s a mistake. It’s not about deploying a chatbot or automating reports. AI touches how decisions get made. How trust is built. How compliance is maintained.
That requires a different kind of planning. A different kind of support. And frankly, a different level of executive clarity.
A Smarter Approach Is Possible - AI doesn't have to be a risky bet
If the CEO believes in the importance of AI but doubts the bench strength of the leadership team, that’s a solvable problem. But it’s not going to get fixed through vague strategy decks or another round of brainstorming.
It takes objective analysis. Trusted external perspective. A clear view of not just what AI can do—but what it should do inside your business.
Next steps don’t have to be overwhelming.
Sometimes a second set of eyes makes all the difference. If your leadership team is exploring AI but needs sharper guidance on vetting the tech, making smart procurement choices, or planning for long-term support—talk to someone who’s done it before.
Even the best leaders ask for help when the stakes are high.